GETTING MY CASE LAW ON DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS TO WORK

Getting My case law on disciplinary proceedings To Work

Getting My case law on disciplinary proceedings To Work

Blog Article

Google Scholar – an enormous database of state and federal case regulation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.

Case regulation is specific on the jurisdiction in which it was rendered. For instance, a ruling in a California appellate court would not commonly be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is really a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; In the event the parents of the boy or Female will not approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they are able to do if they can Slash off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person who is a major, the few is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who provides these kinds of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings with the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against these types of person(s) as provided by law.

Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, plus the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release as being a legally recognized conviction. Read more

149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

The proposal is apparently reasonable and acceded to. In the meantime police shall remain neutral within the private dispute between the parties, however, if any on the individuals is indulged in criminal exercise the police shall acquire prompt action against them under regulation. five. The moment petition is disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more

All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in assist with the Supreme Court, ensuring the enforcement of its judgments. As being the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been achieved, the decision of your Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. Read more

168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Matter: Appeal At times it's easy for any Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to make an attempt to get rid of a case on advantage and more importantly when after recording of evidence it has attained to the stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for merit disposal when it's arrived at this sort of stage. Read more

In some jurisdictions, case legislation might be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family legislation.

139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Concerning the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice just isn't served, the grievance petition could be dismissed. This is because service of your grievance notice is actually a mandatory necessity plus a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The legislation calls for that a grievance notice be served over the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If your employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) if the organization is transprovincial.

182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance of your respondents that pensionary benefits can be withheld on account from the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section 20 of your Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does present for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These include if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could check here possibly be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension may be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established by the government.

In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe as being a foster child. Although the pair experienced two youthful children of their have at home, the social worker didn't inform them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report for the court the following day, the worker reported the boy’s placement within the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the couple experienced younger children.

We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.

Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are not binding, but could be used as persuasive authority, which is to provide substance to the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.

Report this page